Women centric changes in new criminal laws

The new criminal laws have few important women centric changes.

Firstly, the offences related to women and children has been consolidated under chapter V of BNS

Deceitful relationship : Section 69 of the BNS introduces a new offence of deceitful sexual intercourse. The Explanation accompanying this provision specifies that ‘deceptive methods’ cover scenarios such as falsely promising a job or promotion, enticing someone into marriage by concealing one’s true identity etc. However, unlike other sections in this chapter, there is no minimum punishment. The maximum punishment prescribed under the Section is 10 years of imprisonment.

Age of consent : A significant change introduced by the BNS is, the age of consent within the definition of rape (Section 63 of the BNS/section 375 of the IPC) with an increase from 15 to 18 years.

Changes in recording statement : Section 176 BNSS allows recording of rape victims statement at her residence and also allowing audio-video recording, including mobile phone.

Woman Police officer to record the statement of victim of sexual assault:Sec. 180 BNSS provides that The statement of a woman, against whom sexual assault is alleged to have been committed or attempted, shall be recorded by a woman police officer or any woman officer. Such statements may also be recorded by audio-video electronic means. These are in relation to offences under section 64- 71 section 74- 79 of BNS .

Exemption from going to police station: Sec 179 BNSS provides that Women, persons above 60 or with acute illness not bound to attend Police station. This exemption for women is useful as still much apprehension exists in society .

Rape victims report : Section 184(6) BNSS – Medical practitioners are mandated to send the medical report of a victim of rape to the investigating officer within 7 days.

Sign Up for Newsletter

Receive offers, product allerts, styling inspiration and more.

You can unsubscribe at any time.

Related Posts

8

Mar

As privacy is primordial in an increasingly connected and invasive digital world, the right to protect oneself from self-incrimination of digital data is equally important. Electronic records are increasingly becoming part of evidence, but where to draw the line ? The Delhi High Court recently observed that CBi cannot coerce an accused to reveal or …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Disclaimer

The Bar Council of India does not permit advertisement or solicitation by advocates in any form or manner. By accessing this website i.e, www.prachipratap.com, you acknowledge and confirm that you are seeking information relating to Prachi Pratap of your own accord and that there has been no form of solicitation, advertisement or inducement by her. The content of this website is for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement. No material/information provided on this website should be construed as legal advice. Prachi Pratap shall not be liable for consequences of any action taken by relying on the material/information provided on this website. The viewing of this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship.